🔗 Share this article

Increasing worries are present over the possibility of warfare involving East African countries, Ethiopia and the Eritrean government, as aggressive rhetoric has intensified in the past few weeks.

What Has Ethiopian Officials Stated?

Ethiopia's, being landlocked, calls for access to the sea coast through Eritrea has triggered a fierce rhetorical conflict.

The Ethiopian leader first openly declared in last year that his nation's sea access was an crucial concern, comments that Eritrean authorities rejected.

Ties between the both governments have frequently been strained. After a long-standing struggle for freedom, the Eritrean state, which has a extensive maritime frontage, officially seceded from Ethiopian rule in 1993, leaving it without sea access.

In 1998, a territorial conflict erupted in which numerous people lost their lives.

Recent Remarks from Ethiopian Officials

Prime Minister Abiy and army chief the army commander have directly stated ownership of Eritrea's maritime facility of the port of Assab – approximately 60 kilometers from the boundary - and implied the intention to seize it militarily.

Recently, the Prime Minister said Ethiopia's "mistake" of losing entry to the Red Sea as a result of Eritrea secession would be "addressed soon".

Ethiopia's ambassador to Kenya, former General Bacha Debele, said that Assab was "Ethiopia's wealth" and would be given back "using武力".

Eritrea's Response to the Statements

Amid ongoing challenges from Ethiopia, Eritrea's response has been confined to concise remarks on online platforms from Information Minister Yemane Gebremeskel.

Officials have denied Ethiopia's push for access to the Red Sea calling it "hazardous" and a "toxic agenda" of "territorial claims" – a policy of reclaiming previous domains.

Government spokespeople warned on mid-September that attempts to validate "flagrant aggression" would have significant repercussions for the Ethiopian government and its regional partners and is a "limit that should not be crossed|violated|breached".

Security Movements on the Border

Currently, there are little evidence of major military movements in the boundary zones between the neighboring states.

Nevertheless, in Ethiopia, state television has shown completion events of thousands of cadets at various military training camps.

The head of personnel division of the military, General Hachalu, stated recently in an conversation that the military was in a "strong stance" as "numerous of youths" were enlisting, which he said was "a message to our enemies".

Previous Origins of the Tension

For over fifty years from the late 19th century, the territory was ruled by colonial powers.

After World War II, it was then managed by the British administration before evolving into a federated part of Ethiopia.

Yet in the early 1960s Emperor Haile Selassie I ended this arrangement and the region became fully incorporated into the Ethiopian state.

A three-decade long internal conflict followed, ending with the government's loss in 1991. Autonomy was then approved by Eritreans in a plebiscite in 1993.

Temporarily in the 1990s, there were positive ties between the governments in Addis Ababa and Eritrea's capital, but they disagreed over the precise positioning of their mutual frontier, resulting in hostilities in 1998.

Even though this concluded in a truce in 2000, it was partially applied, and the two nations stayed at in dispute.

This changed in 2018, when Abiy made approaches to Eritrean President the president. The two signed a declaration that the conflict was concluded – a decision that won Abiy the Nobel Peace Prize.

The neighboring states were then partners in the country's 2020-2022 civil war in the northern region.

But relations have since broken down again.